Portfolio Signals
How cyber exposure evolves across investments and holdings.
For PE operating partners, portfolio managers, boards.
One Zero-Day Tested Every Holding at Once. Score the Response, Not the Exposure.
Two NetScaler disclosures a week apart gave every holding the same unannounced test, and the time each took to answer four questions says more than which holdings were exposed.
Read the analysis →Declared Recovery Targets Look Alike. Restore Evidence Separates the Holdings.
Every holding reports a recovery target and most report meeting it, so the portfolio signal worth ranking on is the gap between that target and what has been restored end to end.
Read the analysis →Fewer Claims, Larger Losses. The Value Creation Plan Explains Both.
Cyber claim counts are falling while the cost of each claim climbs, and across a portfolio the term that is getting worse is set by the growth plan rather than by the security programme.
Read the analysis →Five Companies Are Rated High Risk. Which One Actually Matters?
A one-time diligence report tells an owner what a company looked like on the day it closed. A portfolio is many companies moving at once, and the risk that matters most is rarely the one with the highest static score.
Read the analysis →